<img src="https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&amp;c2=36750692&amp;cv=3.6.0&amp;cj=1"> ‘Stranger Things’ Writers Name a Bomb That Lost $130M as an Inspiration
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
Your details are incorrect, or aren't in our system yet. Please try again, or sign up if you're new here.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Create a GAMURS
By g up, you agree to our and of Service.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Choose a name
Choose a unique name using 3-30 alphanumeric characters.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Choose your preferences
Choose how we communicate with you, opt out at anytime.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
Check your email
An confirmation link was sent to your email. Don't forget to check your spam!
Enter the email address you used when you ed and we'll send you instructions to reset your .
If you used Apple or Google to create your , this process will create a for your existing .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Reset instructions sent. If you have an with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or if the problem persists.
via Disney

‘Stranger Things’ writers ominously reference an infamous bomb that lost $130 million as a final season inspiration

Just ignore everything the movie did, and it should be fine.

We don’t know a lot about the fifth season of Stranger Things other than the fact it marks the end of the all-conquering Netflix behemoth, but the latest point of reference made by the writers has at least stirred up some concern.

Recommended Videos

Not that it’s got anything to do with the novel teased on their official Twitter , though, but more what happened the last time a major production tried to tackle it head-on. Despite boasting Ava DuVernay behind the camera, a hefty budget, and a stacked cast that numbered Storm Reid, Chris Pine, Oprah Winfrey, Mindy Kaling, Reese Witherspoon, and many more, A Wrinkle in Time became one of Disney’s biggest-ever bombs.

Image via Netflix

Bringing in a meager $133 million at the box office, the lavish fantasy ended up losing the Mouse House an estimated $130 million, so it’s easy to see why people are worried that one of the most popular shows of the entire streaming age potentially looking to Madeleine L’Engle’s beloved 1962 tome as an inspiration might not be the wisest move.

Of course, it’s not as if Stranger Things hasn’t based the majority of its entire existence on cribbing from other well-known stories, IPs, and franchises, but heading back to the 1960s would certainly be a new one for a series that’s always been so heavily steeped in all things 80s.

It would be better for Hawkins’ final stand to be its own thing, but on the plus side, there’s surely not much chance it’ll fare any worse at lifting liberally from A Wrinkle in Time than the feature-length version did.


We Got This Covered is ed by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small commission. Learn more about our Policy
Author
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves: Words. Lots of words.