<img src="https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&amp;c2=36750692&amp;cv=3.6.0&amp;cj=1"> Does Donald Trump Have Immunity in the Jan. 6 Insurrection Case? The Supreme Court's Ruling, Explained
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
Your details are incorrect, or aren't in our system yet. Please try again, or sign up if you're new here.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Create a GAMURS
By g up, you agree to our and of Service.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Choose a name
Choose a unique name using 3-30 alphanumeric characters.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Choose your preferences
Choose how we communicate with you, opt out at anytime.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
Check your email
An confirmation link was sent to your email. Don't forget to check your spam!
Enter the email address you used when you ed and we'll send you instructions to reset your .
If you used Apple or Google to create your , this process will create a for your existing .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Reset instructions sent. If you have an with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or if the problem persists.
Images via Wiki Commons

Does Donald Trump have immunity in the Jan. 6 insurrection case? The Supreme Court’s ruling, explained

Trump scored a "big win" with the SCOTUS decision

It’s back to the drawing board for Federal prosecutors seeking to try former President Donald Trump on 2020 election subversion charges when, among other examples, he allegedly helped instigate the Jan. 6 attack at the capitol.

Recommended Videos

In a 6-3 decision, the SCOTUS announced on July 1, 2024, that current and former presidents are immune from prosecution for “official” White House acts. Presidents, however, are not completely immune from prosecution for any action arguably outside the purview of a president, or an action well beyond their official capacity. Presidents are never immune from prosecution as private citizens. It’s up to lower courts to decide which is which, the ruling said.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the decision applied, “equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy, or party,” and that the ruling would prevent any president from being under constant “criminal scrutiny.” Meanwhile, Justice Sandra Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, wrote, “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.” All three liberal Justices dissented from the ruling.

Does Donald Trump have immunity for Jan. 6?

via Adam Schiff/X

The criminal cases against Trump, including his election interference indictments, now face a daunting task: to prove whether Trump’s alleged criminal actions were not “official” or “core” acts as president, protected by the Constitution. As for the Jan 6, case, a Federal Court had already stated that Trump was not immune from prosecution, and further hearings and legal filings are now required to show Trump’s election indictment relates to actions beyond his official duties.

Should the Federal Court prove that some or all of the actions Trump took to interfere with the 2020 election — including the Jan. 6 insurrection — were not within his power as president, there will likely still be further appeals, delaying the case until after the 2024 election, when Trump could retake the White House. As such, Trump called the decision a “BIG WIN FOR OUR CONSTITUTION AND DEMOCRACY,” and said, “PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!”

President Biden responded to the ruling

via ACLU/X

After the SCOTUS decision was announced, a Biden White House spokesman said, “As President Biden has said, nobody is above the law. That is a core American principle and how our system of justice works. We need leaders like President Biden who respect the justice system and don’t tear it down.”

Meanwhile, Democratic Representative Jim Clyburn of South Carolina added, “I understand that the court is sending us back to some determination to be made as to what is or is not private action, as opposed to public action. But I think it is pretty clear to see what is not public in this particular instance. And so I’m all for us moving forward on all fronts taking the Supreme Court decision into .”

Also responding to the SCOTUS decision, Former January 6 Committee chairman Bennie Thompson called the court, “lawless and corrupt … By granting a twice-impeached felon absolute immunity for many of his acts that sought to undermine the legitimate results of the 2020 Presidential election, such as weaponizing the Department of Justice to do his campaign’s bidding, these extreme Justices clearly put the ex-President above the law,” Thompson said.


We Got This Covered is ed by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small commission. Learn more about our Policy
Author
Image of William Kennedy
William Kennedy
William Kennedy is a full-time freelance content writer and journalist in Eugene, OR. William covered true crime, among other topics for Grunge.com. He also writes about live music for the Eugene Weekly, where his beat also includes arts and culture, food, and current events. He lives with his wife, daughter, and two cats who all politely accommodate his obsession with Doctor Who and The New Yorker.