<img src="https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&amp;c2=36750692&amp;cv=3.6.0&amp;cj=1"> Doctor Who Review: "The Angels Take Manhattan" (Series 7 Episode 5)
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
Your details are incorrect, or aren't in our system yet. Please try again, or sign up if you're new here.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Create a GAMURS
By g up, you agree to our and of Service.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Choose a name
Choose a unique name using 3-30 alphanumeric characters.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Choose your preferences
Choose how we communicate with you, opt out at anytime.
Something went wrong. Try again, or if the problem persists.
Check your email
An confirmation link was sent to your email. Don't forget to check your spam!
Enter the email address you used when you ed and we'll send you instructions to reset your .
If you used Apple or Google to create your , this process will create a for your existing .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and of Service apply.
Reset instructions sent. If you have an with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or if the problem persists.

Doctor Who Review: “The Angels Take Manhattan” (Series 7 Episode 5)

“This is the story of Amelia Pond, and this is how it ends.” It would be an understatement to say that Amy Pond and Rory Williams are the two greatest and most beloved companions of the modern era of Doctor Who. They are two of the most iconic, universally celebrated characters in the show’s forty-nine year history, creations that will be ed with the same fondness as Who legends like Sara Jane or Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart.
This article is over 12 years old and may contain outdated information

WARNING: CONTAINS SPOILERS

Recommended Videos

“This is the story of Amelia Pond, and this is how it ends.” 

It would be an understatement to say that Amy Pond and Rory Williams are the two greatest and most beloved companions of the modern era of Doctor Who. They are two of the most iconic, universally celebrated characters in the show’s forty-nine year history, creations that will be ed with the same fondness as Who legends like Sara Jane or Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart. The way Steven Moffat and his team wrote these characters, weaving their histories in with the Doctor’s in complex, meaningful ways, was consistently fantastic. And in Karen Gillan and Arthur Darvill, the show found two wonderful actors who could go toe-to-toe with Matt Smith’s historically brilliant performance in any given episode. For the generation of fans who ed the series with the Eleventh Doctor, Amy and Rory are an inseparable part of Doctor Who, as crucial to the show’s creative success as the TARDIS or the Doctor.

Given the incredibly vast stamp these characters left, finding an organic, emotional way to remove them from the narrative, once and for all, seems like a nearly insurmountable challenge. It may, in fact, be Moffat’s single greatest trial since introducing these characters in The Eleventh Hour.

And I am, to be honest, fairly ambivalent about the way he wrapped things up.

Part of me simply wants to reject any and all efforts to give Amy and Rory a grand, tragic send-off. I believed very strongly, when Series Six was airing, that the late-season episode The God Complex was the right place to leave these characters. In the story, the Doctor realized how much he was endangering this couple he loved so much, and ultimately left them in a nice flat in London, telling them to start forging independent, non-TARDIS lives together. The God Complex itself did a beautiful job building to the Doctor’s decision, but more importantly, the entire thematic thrust of the sixth series seemed to be building to that moment. The Doctor had been grappling with the impact of his carefree ways since the premiere, and Amy and Rory were slowly realizing that a life with the Doctor was not permanently sustainable. This exit was melancholy, yes, but not overwhelmingly sad, both because it seemed like the natural next step for these characters, and because the viewer could imagine for themselves the new sorts of adventures Amy and Rory might have learning to live normal lives.

This is how I felt at the time, and I have wondered ever since if Moffat could feasibly bring these characters back into the fold and give them an even stronger send-off in the course of just five episodes. Now that the end has come, I do not believe he succeeded in doing so. The Angels Take Manhattan is a shockingly abrupt conclusion to these characters’ stories, one that fails to play into larger thematic or narrative arcs.

That, perhaps, is the key to my frustration. The Angels Take Manhattan operates almost entirely in a vacuum, occasionally playing on our collective nostalgia but not on our collective understanding of who Amy and Rory are or how they have developed. What happens to tear them away from the Doctor has literally nothing to do with Amy, Rory, the Doctor, or anything they have ever done together. It isn’t about their triumphs, or their failings; it doesn’t concern their pasts or their futures; it is simply a random act of violence from the Weeping Angels, one that creates an inescapable temporal loop that Amy must close by leaving the Doctor forever.

That bothers me. It bothers me to no end, especially considering how Moffat has shown countless times before that he can build an effective, satisfying arc. But Rory and Amy’s exit isn’t about arc. It’s about finding a clever way to make sure the Doctor can never see them again, and while I actually think the final scenes work extremely well on their own, they frustrate me when I consider it all in context.

Continue reading on the next page…


We Got This Covered is ed by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small commission. Learn more about our Policy
Author
Image of Jonathan R. Lack
Jonathan R. Lack
With ten years of experience writing about movies and television, including an ongoing weekly column in The Denver Post's YourHub section, Jonathan R. Lack is a ionate voice in the field of film criticism. Writing is his favorite hobby, closely followed by watching movies and TV (which makes this his ideal gig), and is working on his first film-focused book.